Partner Page

I think you’ve made an excellent point here. I recently came across an article on <a href="https://tim88.tech/" rel="nofollow ugc">tim88</a> that dives deeper into this subject, and it offers some great perspectives.

I fully agree with this statement, and I think it’s something that’s been explored in detail on <a href="http://tim88.us/" rel="nofollow ugc">tim88</a>. The insights shared there really complement this viewpoint.

Since India’s independence from Britain in 1947, the status of English in India has been deeply political – entwined with questions of identity, power, and national direction. Today, English is one of several official languages in India, spoken by about 10% of the population. Hindi is the first language for around 44% of citizens, according to the 2011 census. [url=https://trip-scan.biz]tripskan [/url] But in recent years, Modi’s BJP has placed particular emphasis on promoting Hindi and reducing the use of English in public life. The prime minister almost never delivers speeches in English, preferring Hindi for national addresses such as his monthly radio program. His administration has encouraged officials to use Hindi on social media and in government correspondence – though, after criticism from non-Hindi-speaking states, clarified that this was intended mainly for the Hindi belt in the north. https://trip-scan.biz tripscan top When India hosted world leaders for the 2023 G20 summit in New Delhi, invitations were sent out from “Bharat” – the Sanskrit or Hindi name for the country – instead of “India,” fueling speculation that the government aims to ultimately phase out the country’s English designation altogether. Modi’s critics have been quick to note his political motives behind these moves. With its roots in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing organization that advocates Hindu hegemony within India, the BJP’s language policies resonate with many in a country where nearly 80% of people are Hindu. Analysts say the BJP is seeking to capitalize on this demographic by promoting language policies that strengthen its support base in the north. According to Rita Kothari, an English professor from Ashoka University, the government “is certainly interested in homogenizing the country and making Hindi more widespread.” But that policy can also backfire – in part because many regions, such as Marathi-speaking Maharashtra in the west – are staunchly proud of their local language. The violent clashes in the state’s megacity Mumbai earlier this month were sparked by the regional government’s controversial decision to make Hindi a compulsory third language in public primary schools. Pushback and protest has also been especially strong in the south, where English and regional languages such as Tamil, Telugu, and Kannada are valued as symbols of local identity and autonomy.

I fully agree with this. I recently read a post on <a href="https://tim88.tech/" rel="nofollow ugc">Tin 88</a> that explored the same issue, and the perspectives shared there were really eye-opening.

I think you’ve made a solid argument, and it's something I’ve also read about on <a href="http://tim88.us/" rel="nofollow ugc">Tin88</a>. They offer a comprehensive analysis of this subject too.